The Razees

Ship design during the Age of Sail was characterized by a constant struggle to achieve an optimum balance between speed and firepower. As technology and the art of shipbuilding advanced the size of ships increased.

Under the standard rating system for men o’war, ships of the line came in four rates. 1st rates carrying 100-120 guns, 2d rates carrying 90-98 guns, 3rd rates carrying 64-80 guns, and 4th rates carrying 48-60 guns. By the latter half of the 19th century it was obvious that 4th rates and those 3rd rates carrying fewer than 74 guns could no longer hold a place in the line of battle. To compound their weakness as line of battle ships they were too slow to be used as frigates.

Navies were confronted with the dilemma of how to best use these ships as scrapping them before their useful life cycle was ended wasn’t a good option. The solution was to convert them as razees.

A razee was simply a larger warship with a deck removed, or razed, to convert it to a large frigate. The resulting ship would have the strength of construction to carry larger guns and take more punishment than other ships in its class. As a bonus, their increased length made them fast sailers.

This process will be familiar to anyone who wrestled in high school or college. A razee is the guy at the low end of a weight class who could shed 7-10 pounds in a week so he could wrestle at a couple of classes lower than his natural weight.

Take, for instance, Sir Edward Pellew’s famous HMS Indefatigable. Indefatigable started life as a 64-gun 3rd rate that was obsolete upon its launch in 1784. A fact that was recognized by the fact that this new ship was never commissioned. In 1794, Indefatigable was razeed into a 44-gun frigate converting a useless ship of the line into a frigate that could outsail anything it could not outfight.

As technology progressed, razees became more extreme. HMS Majestic was a 74-gun 3rd rate that was razeed into a 58-gun frigate. The US Navy razeed the USS Macedonian, the former 38-gun frigate HMS Macedonian, into a 20-gun sloop. The 50-gun USS Cumberland was razeed into a 24-gun sloop. In these latter two cases not only did the longer hull length and heavier construction overmatch other ships in their class, improvements in technology enabled them to carry the same weight of broadside as they had as larger ships.

Advertisements

4 Comments

Filed under Age of Sail, Naval Architecture

4 responses to “The Razees

  1. Pingback: Making Virtue of Necessity « Age Of Sail

  2. Mark

    The HMS Indefatigable was razeed to a 38 not a 44. 64’s were not useless, several took part in the battle of Tafalgar. A razeed liner wasn’t necessarily stronger than a frigate of the same size; the razeeing process removed much of the original timber. A razee frigate was considerably slower than a frigate of the same length, consider the Constitution escaping the Majestic. Consequently, Britain started building more of the larger frigates instead of razeeing old liners.

    • billcrews

      Most sources say Indefatigable was cut into a 44 gun razee. For instance, http://goo.gl/hkUHxG, So I don’t think you are correct.
      Razee did not remove most of the timber. The ribs, scantlings, and hull timbers remained those of a 64. Otherwise the ship would have to have been torn apart and rebuild which would have defeated the purpose of a razee.
      There were only three 64s at Trafalgar: Africa, Agamemnon, Polyphemus. Three is not “several.” http://www.nelsonsnavy.co.uk/battle-of-trafalgar.html

  3. Hi.
    I have put a painting I did some years ago of a ship, on my page, probably copied from a Pocock.
    It shows a 44 gun Frigate (??) but could it be a Razee?
    Anyone help please?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s